emma is bored #2

5 0 0
                                    

i had a topic to talk about. i do not remember it. give me a moment please.

wait...

think i might have...

nope.

I HAVE IT.

so this is based off of my RS exam i had today. we were asked the question:

would you torture the innocent child of a terrorist just to find out where the bomb location is?

uh NO.

you should torture some innocent child (named Bob) just to get back at a terrorist. yeah, sure, they're a terrorist, but that doesn't make it right to mentally scar a child for some mediocre purpose. how would you like it if that was your child that was being tortured, your child that went through all this mental pain and suffering. you wouldn't like it because it is wrong. but only because it is your child. if it was someone else child you probably wouldn't care less because of the saying "sacrifice one life to save a hundred." bet you wouldn't follow that if your child was involved in it would you? no, no you wouldn't. so don't put other peoples children through it no matter how horrible those people are. and besides, say the plan didn't work. all you would end up with is:

mentally scarred child? check.

super angry terrorist? check.

and then this terrorist might go and blow things up because of what you did to their child. then we are in a vicious circle.

that poor child is going to look at their past like,

Billy: "i had a great childhood what about you?"

Bob: "i was tortured for fun."

yeah, not great is it.

tell me your opinions in the comments :)

buh bye.

Emma is boredWhere stories live. Discover now