The Science of Conspiracy Theories

Does the Crown rule the world?

Does the Crown rule the world?

This is a conspiracy theory that a Brit would understand. This theory claims that there are two crowns in England. Queen Elizabeth II is one, but she serves in a ceremonial capacity. It's the other crown that fuels the controversy.

The real crown is a committee of 12 banks, headed by the Bank of England that rules the world from the City of London, also called 'The City'. Allegedly, 'The City' is the wealthiest square mile on Earth and it's not part of England, just like Washington D.C. is supposedly not part of the United States.
Now comes the good part. When the Queen wants to deal with official business in 'The City' she meets the Lord Mayor at the Temple Bar. She then is given permission to enter 'The City' and goes with the Mayor, walking several paces behind him.

She meets him in bar? Say what?

The theory is that the Temple (Templar) Bar is the justice arm of the Crown and controls global legal fraud by means of the Bar Association franchises, which include the Middle Temple, Inner Temple, Lincoln's Inn and Gray's Inn. These represent holdings of the secret societies.

Allegedly, the Crown has made billions while operating under the British military's protection, and this money is not part of the British wealth. This harkens back to the idea of the Rothschild's controlling everything. This theory would make them and their descendants wealthier than anyone on Earth.
This is even crazier. Supposedly, the Bar attorneys in the United States owe allegiance to the Crown. All Bar Associations in the world are part of the Crown's franchises. Five Templar Bar Attorneys signed the American Declaration of Independence. This would suggest that the 'Crown' association justified the American War for Independence in order to obtain Land grants and invisible contracts in America, including contracts of commercial equity that seals a relationship to the 'Crown'. In other words, all justice transactions and legal contracts are connected to the 'Crown' and are transferred back to the 'Crown' through taxation.

I see this idea as a means to justify political control by British banks and the reason why the United States bailed England out in two major wars both with large sums of money but also lives of soldiers.

It sounds kind of far fetched to me. If this were the case, why would England have lost so much trying to fight a revolution? All they had to do was give American colonists some token representation in parliament and the war would never have happened.

Thanks for reading.