BHARATVARSH

KUCH BHI !? (RAVAN)

Today in the kuch bhi series we have Dashanan Ravan !

Disclaimer - As it is kuch bhi !? series, yadi alp buddhi ke karan aapka roast ho jata hai toh yeh aap hi ki galti hai.

--------------------------------

For many years there has been an on going trend to glorify Ravan at the stake of Shri Ram.

Media wale dikhate hai ki Shri Ram aur Ravan ek jaise hi toh the, koi fark nahi tha. And this is more serious than one may think.

Toh Tiktok ke saste replacement, Reels aur Mojo type jagah mei ek trend chala tha. Few girls were saying this -

Hume Ram jaisa Pati nahi chahiye, Ravan jaisa bhai chahiye.

KUCH BHI !?

Matlab tumhe ek rapist, egoistic, arrogant, kidnapper bhai chahiye ? Not to mention who killed his own sister's husband (defense or attack, we're not sure).

Aur yaha mujhe laga 21st century mei buddhi ka vikas huya hoga.....

Main stream media always shows only one side of Ravan, the great Shivbhakt side and learned soul. Which is true, he was a great devotee and very intelligent.

This is something used to compare him with Shri Ram, who was also a great devotee of Mahadev.

But there is BIG difference, let me tell you.

Ravan had eyes on his aradhaya's wife, Mata Parvati.

Shri Ram treated his aradhaya's wife as his mother. Just remember the Sati incident.

One difference, but a BIG ONE !

Another claim is that Ravan was very righteous, he although kidnapped Mata Sita, but never touched her.

Ahaha.....kitna bada dharmatma hai yeh bolo....IDIOTS !

Ravan didn't touch Mata Sita because of Nalkuber !!!!!

Apsara Rambha was about to be Nalkuber's wife, who was the son of Kuber, half-brother of Ravan.

According to this relation, Rambha was Ravan's daughter in law, equivalent to his daughter, yet overcome by lust he RAPED her.

Thus Nalkuber cursed him that if he touched a woman with the intention of violating her then his head will explode into thousand pieces !

And there is this upcoming movie of Pratik Gandhi, that might have come to your attention. And there is this dialogue -

Ravan - Aapne humari behan ka anadar kiya, humne aapke stree ka anadar kiya lekin humne naak nahi kaati.

They are showing that Ravan was better than Shri Ram ??

ABEY HALVO SHARAM KARO NARAK MEI JALOGE !

First of all, Suparnakha ki naak lakshman ji ne kaati thi because she was attacking Mata Sita. Thus in order to save his Bhabhi, whom he considered equal to mother, Lakshman ji throws the dagger at Surpnakha.

And pseudo-feminism ka itna hi shauk hai toh yaha genders switch kardo ek baar ke liye.

If a man was forcing himself on a woman like Surpnakha was forcing herself on Shri Ram, then the same people would have been like naak nahi gala kaatna tha.

Itna bhed bhav kyu ? I swear these people are nothing but a bunch of reprehensible reptiles.

And the thing ki Ravan never touched Mata Sita, yet Shri Ram killed him.

Listen here you classless catastrophe, agar koi tumhare behen-betiyo ko kidnap karke le jaye, ek saal tak rakhe aur pakdaane ke baad bole, "humne chhuya toh nahi" kya tum use jane doge ? Maroge nahi ?

And the thing ki Shri Ram ne Agni-pariksha dilayi....bruh....

Jo Sita Mata Ravan ne kidnap kiya tha woh Vedavati thi, and actual Sita Mata was with Agnidev, thus Agni-pariksha was held so the real Sita Mata can come.

And the that reminds me on one more thing.

The Sita Mata who was kidnapped was not Shri Ram's wife. He easily could've said - Not my wife not my problem.

But he didn't, he fought a war to bring her back, because although she was not his Sita, she was a woman who was kidnapped.

And regarding Uttar Ramayan, maine pehle hi ek chapter likha hai iss hi book mei..

And the some idiots are also like - under Ravan's rule Lanka was flourishing, Vibhishan degraded it.

Buddhi ka vikas karo, thoda itihaas padho !

Lanka ka sara dhan luta huya maal tha, Kuber ka dhan tha woh. And Lanka ki keval rakshas praja sukhi thi, manushyo par atyachar hota tha !

When Hanuman ji offers Mata Sita to mount on him and escape Lanka, she denies because of two reasons.

1) She was pious and pativrata woman and shouldn't touch another man.

2) She says that there are many humans who are tortured by Asurs, and Shri Ram must come to free them.

Humanity is evolving, just backwards.

On a serious note - If you will glorify Ravan at the stake of Shri Ram, you will not get the learnings from Ramayan. Same thing applies to Mahabharat, glorifying Kauravas at the stake of Pandavas will deprive you of it's eternal teachings.

These epics are like Amrit to humanity, we must learn from it, altering it will do us no good.

I understand the view of some people who see the world as grey....true the world is grey but nallo, sabhi grey ke ek hi shade nahi hote ! Some are dark grey, some are light grey !

But if yet you see the world as just one shade of grey then beta yeh tumhara viewpoint nahi hai tum colorblind ho ! Jaa ke kisi aakh ke doctor ko dikhao.

The thing is if you glorify Ravan, and be against Shri Ram then the entire Ramayan will do you no good.

Similarly if you degrade Pandavas and Krishna, you won't be able to benefit from Gita.

Conclusion - The protagonists are right for a reason.

□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□
A/N

Dekho bhai, Shri Ram ka context that toh aaj hum mariyada mei rahe, nahi toh roasting ka track record bahut tagda hai humara.

BOLO JAI SIYA RAM ! JAI HANUMAN !