Violet Vignettes

Bitch...

M1, M1, M1...

I cracked the timeline code and this is why you always trust your instincts because bitch... I knew it!

It's been a long time since I externally theorized on the two bobble heads and all of their shenanigans. I matured enough to not give a fuck and I love that for me. However, I'm a very inquisitive person and I hate not having answers to my questions. In the midst of looking for a different answer, I wound up collecting a vital piece of evidence for a long-time developing conspiracy theory of mine regarding the Taffy Timeline.

That book has always been a little bit shaky in the sense of the timeline and everybody knows this, hence its attachment to the rumor of people lying about ages. I'm not here to rant about Prince grooming because it is what it is. I'M HERE TO THEORIZE ABOUT A MARRIAGE THAT HAS CONFUSED ME FOR A VERY LONG TIME NOW.

So... The banished ones (M1 stans) have a strong argument of "she was his wife" and while my counter is often the fact that she wasn't his only wife, it can still be argued that regardless he still married her for a reason.

AND I ALWAYS WONDERED WHY.

The engagement makes sense. If she was the harem favorite and he got in his feelings, boom. THAT MAKES PERFECT SENSE. But, based on my Princeology studies, that was supposed to be an engagement that never went to the next step. There's a long time rumor that it was a shotgun wedding and there's also one that the marriage was supposedly not legally. I almost went to law school so I jumped in to do my googles. The marriage is for sure, but the ending is still questionable. It's possible the divorce was filed in Jersey and they lock all divorce records as if they never happened but the book says she signed the annulment in '98– ANYWAY. THAT'S ANOTHER RABBIT HOLE. LET'S GET BACK TO THE ROOTS OF MY DISCOVERY.

It started with the due date. The book says she carried to term while also stating their angel was delivered early. To term starts at about 37 weeks... Their angel was here for about a week before going home in the twenties of October. Conception being exactly February 14th on a due date calculator means the due date goes exactly to November 6, the date listed in the book. Not that such an event isn't possible, it's just unlikely... Because due dates given without knowing exact conception date are almost never a bullseye, just in the ball park. They clearly were having a lot of sex, something said, so you'd never know for sure that it was the wedding night. Not to mention, that if you go from February 14th to week of October 16, that's 35 weeks... 35 weeks is not full term.

Although... If you go with the theory of a January conception, everything makes sense.

For one, January 21ish (random date) to that October area, is 38 weeks. 38 weeks is considered full term. It's before the due date, but still full term in a medical sense.

Then, take a look at the wedding with that in mind. The goal supposedly was for the wedding to be in Paris. The book claims that didn't happen because it was too hard to book the venue he wanted on such short notice... But if you got engaged in July, you don't think that's enough time for Taffy to pull his strings and get it? (... Unless they didn't jump into planning until something came up last minute.) Sometimes people told him no, so that's fair! Yet, hiring the flower girls and shit... That feels so disingenuous to me. How convenient is it that Kirk's brother is the minister? Empty seats in the church?! FOR A MAN THAT BELOVED IN HIS HOMETOWN?! It feels last minute to me. They try to bring up the custom china, but again, that could've been ordered after the engagement.

Then... There's a story of her taking herself off payroll after the Hawaii shows because she planned to get pregnant. But if January is it, she was just too far along to keep running around on stage. There's also a story in the book that I'm gonna throw in.

February 14th to May 12th (Mother's Day 1996) is 12 weeks... That's 2 going on 3 months. Although, January 21st (again just to get that week lumped in) to May 12th is 16 weeks... That's 3, almost 4 four months.

I tried to give her the benefit of doubt and say maybe she meant March because that's when Girl 6 actually premiered but that'd be a month after February 14th and I know she isn't that dumb. Plus, there's pictures of her there with a loose fitting dress and no visible bump. I even tried to take in account that single photo of her baby bump that has the date of July 8, 1996. I was like, "Okay... This could be proof. February to July is 5 months." However, the week count of that January week to July 8 is 5.5 months and the count from February 14 to that July date is 4, almost 5... Which is a close one but I'm sensing a theme of intentional ambiguity in the name of casting a certain light on what occurred.

At the end of the day, I remain fully convinced it was a shotgun and, honestly, that's not a super big deal. It just opens a door to make me wonder what else she's twisted the narrative about to maintain this good girl image bestowed upon her. To be engaged and get pregnant is really not a big deal... Why lie? You were engaged. I've always had the guttural feeling that M1 very carefully tells the truth in an intentional way that fits her perspective and what she wants the situation to be perceived as. It can translate to those who feel bad for her as the woman still lovesick over the bigheaded butterscotch man and that's how I saw it for a long time. I still feel that way about a lot of the circumstances presented but, this reflection moment just really shifts things to clarify how capable she is to twist this shit up.

... I'm watching that lady forever. She's slicker than people give her credit for. She not the smartest but she's slick and she plays that smiley, eternal love shit to an expert level. At least M2 is silent... Why would she do that?! To make matters worse, we'll never know the truth.